Bernie Sanders

Elon Musk’s fortune recently crossed into territory few people thought possible. Social Security’s finances, meanwhile, are headed in the opposite direction.

That contrast was front and center when Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT), took aim at the world’s richest man, arguing that Musk pays the same amount into Social Security as someone earning $184,500 a year.

"Today, Elon Musk, a trillionaire, pays the same amount into Social Security as someone making $184,500," Sanders wrote in a June 12 post on X.

Don’t Miss:

He wasn’t simply criticizing Musk’s wealth. He was making a case for one of the biggest changes to Social Security funding in decades.

"If we end that absurdity and lift the cap on taxable income, we can make Social Security solvent for 75 years and expand benefits by $2,400," Sanders wrote. "My Social Security bill does that."

The $184,500 Ceiling Drawing Fire

Most workers pay Social Security taxes on every paycheck throughout the year. But only up to a point.

For 2026, wages above $184,500 are exempt from the Social Security portion of payroll taxes. Once a worker reaches that threshold, the 6.2% tax no longer applies to additional earnings.

That means someone earning $184,500 and someone earning millions in salary can end up contributing the same amount toward Social Security during the year.

Sanders has long argued that structure no longer makes sense, particularly as wealth at the top has exploded.

His latest example was Musk, whose net worth surged into trillionaire territory after SpaceX’s valuation climb and public debut helped propel him over the $1 trillion mark. Yet under current rules, his Social Security contributions remain capped the same as a high-earning professional.

A Retirement Program Running Short On Time

The debate comes as Social Security faces mounting financial pressure.

According to the latest Social Security Trustees Report, the trust fund that pays retirement benefits is projected to run short of reserves in the early 2030s. If lawmakers fail to act, automatic benefit reductions could follow.

Trending: Wall Street Traders Pay Thousands For Market Data. This Platform Gives Everyday Investors Access To Advanced Tools.

That reality has turned Social Security into one of Washington’s biggest long-term financial challenges.

An aging population, longer life expectancies and fewer workers supporting each retiree have squeezed the program’s finances for years.

The result is a simple but uncomfortable question: Who should pay more to keep the system running?

Sanders Says The Wealthiest Can Close The Gap

Sanders’ proposed Social Security Expansion Act would apply payroll taxes to income above $250,000, creating what supporters often call a "donut hole" between the current wage cap and the new threshold.

Backers of the proposal say the additional revenue could keep Social Security fully funded for 75 years while also increasing benefits by roughly $2,400 annually.

Supporters also note that most households would see no direct tax increase because the proposal targets higher-income earners.

Critics, however, argue that higher payroll taxes could discourage investment, entrepreneurship and economic growth. Some favor other solutions, including gradually raising the retirement age or adjusting benefits for wealthier retirees.

Others point out that Musk’s wealth largely comes from stock ownership rather than traditional wages, making comparisons between net worth and payroll taxes more complicated than they first appear.

See Also: What If Your Budget Adjusted To Your Life—Instead Of The Other Way Around?

The Debate Isn’t Going Away

Congress has yet to rally around a single solution, and major Social Security reforms remain politically difficult.

But as the program’s financial clock continues ticking, proposals that once seemed unlikely are getting renewed attention.

Read Next: Investors With $1M+ Often Use Advisors for Tax Strategy — This Tool Matches You With One in Minutes

Building Wealth Across More Than Just the Market

Arrived

Realberry

FarmTogether

Farmland has historically held its value through market volatility and delivered returns uncorrelated to stocks and bonds. For accredited investors, FarmTogether offers direct access to high-quality U.S. farmland starting at $15,000 — fully managed, with no landlord headaches.

Immersed

Fundrise

Private real estate and private credit can add income and stability to a stock-heavy portfolio. Fundrise offers access to diversified private real estate and credit strategies through an easy-to-use platform, with professionally managed portfolios designed to generate passive income and long-term growth.

Mode Mobile

EquityMultiple

For accredited investors looking beyond stocks and bonds,EquityMultiple provides access to vetted commercial real estate deals starting at $5,000, with only ~5% of opportunities passing their due diligence process.