Chuck Edwards

Republican Representative Chuck Edwards is facing a tough reelection battle in a light-red North Carolina House district after the House Ethics Committee recommended he be censured over his conduct toward two young, female staffers.

Edwards represents North Carolina’s 11th District, based around Asheville and the state’s rural western region. It backed President Donald Trump by just under 10 points in the 2024 presidential race, so Democrats have viewed it as a potential pickup opportunity, as they believe the 2026 midterms will present them with a more favorable national environment due to Trump’s declining national approval rating.

The ethics committee’s recommendation that he be censured adds new uncertainty to the race ahead of November. North Carolina held its primaries in March, so Edwards has already won his party’s nomination. But he was expected to face a competitive race even prior to the recommendation in what has become among the more competitive House races of the midterms.

Read More on Politics

Could Chuck Edwards Lose Reelection?

Edwards is set to face Democrat Jamie Ager in the November election. Ager is the grandson of former Representative James Clarke, a Democrat who represented the district more than 30 years ago.

Kalshi gave Ager a 58 percent chance of flipping the seat in November on Tuesday evening, an increase from one week earlier when he had only a 52 percent chance of victory. On Polymarket, Ager had a 59 percent chance of winning in November, roughly the same chance he had one week earlier.

Prediction markets allow traders to buy and sell contracts tied to political outcomes and current events, aggregating real‑money wagers into probability estimates. Prices fluctuate as traders react to polling, fundraising, candidate developments and broader political trends. They measure trader sentiment at a given moment but do not always accurately predict the future.

Polling on the race is limited.

An Impact Research survey, an Ager internal previously shared with Newsweek, gave Ager a single-point lead over Edwards, 45 percent to 44 percent, with an additional 10 percent undecided. It surveyed 500 likely voters from December 15-17, 2025, and had a margin of error of plus or minus 4.4 percentage points.

The district’s rural areas are more conservative, but Asheville has kept Republicans to more narrow victories in the district. Parts of the district around Asheville, in fact, were among the areas that defied national trends and shifted toward Democrats in the 2024 election.

Sabato’s Crystal Ball, a key forecaster, announced last week they were reclassifying the race as a toss-up.

“Edwards’s challenger is Jamie Ager (D), who has fundraised well and whose grandfather held a version of this seat in the 1980s. The district backed Trump by a shade under 10 points, so it’s also clearly red-leaning, but, again, the environment could sand down some of that generic Republican lean, and Edwards has some problems. So we’re calling this a Toss-up too,” analyst Kyle Kondik wrote in the update.

The Cook Political Report still views the race as leaning toward Republicans.

Democrats are investing in the race. House Majority Forward, an organization affiliated with the House Majority PAC, on Monday announced that they are investing $480,000 into television reservations against Edwards.

Edwards is also facing fundraising problems. In the previous quarter, he raised about $155,000 compared to Ager’s $1.4 million.

He was first elected in 2022 after unseating former Representative Madison Cawthorn in a Republican primary.

House Ethics Panel Urges Edwards Censure

The House Ethics Committee urged a censure after concluding that Edwards engaged in inappropriate conduct toward two young female staff members. A censure is one of the most serious forms of discipline available in the House short of expulsion. While it does not remove a lawmaker from office, it serves as a formal public condemnation by the chamber.

“The Committee therefore has recommended that the House of Representatives adopt the Report, and with it, a censure of Representative Edwards for the conduct described therein. The Committee intends to bring a privileged resolution for consideration and vote by the full House,” a press release from the committee reads.

In a 25-page report, the bipartisan Ethics Committee found that Edwards failed "to adhere to the spirit of rules prohibiting sexual harassment of and unwanted advances to House staffers," and repeatedly blurred professional boundaries with two aides.

The committee's report detailed what it described as a pattern of gifts and personal attention that fell well outside normal workplace boundaries. Investigators said Edwards gave the two aides more than $1,000 worth of jewelry, along with designer handbags, firearms, shoes, flowers, a laptop and a cellphone.

The report also cited vacations, performance tickets and one-on-one dinners, characterizing the conduct as "beyond norms of professional behavior."

In a 15-page response published alongside the report, Edwards’ counsel wrote that the committee’s findings “exonerate Representative Edwards under House Rules governing sexual misconduct or harassment.”