New York
Latest Coverage
See all articles
Jeffries blindsided after Dems help force vote denouncing socialism
“I didn’t get a heads up. You’ll have to talk to Katherine,” Jeffries said, referring to House Minority Whip Katherine Clark (D-MA).
He told reporters later Tuesday that it was “a significant breach of trust” and did not rule out consequences, saying that repercussions for Golden and Gluesenkamp Perez were “under discussion.”
In an X post, socialist influencer Emma Vigeland called out Jeffries for being “left in the dark” about the vote.
“Pitiful. [Nancy] Pelosi was no leftist, but she could whip her caucus. She would never have been left in the dark like this,” Vigeland wrote. “Jeffries is bad at the basics of his job, and passing the buck onto Katherine Clark is poor leadership. NFL quarterbacks talk like this before they’re benched.”
The vote occurred shortly after the House, along bipartisan lines, passed a funding measure keeping the government open through mid-December. Conservative hardliners, upset with provisions within the funding bill and the fact that Johnson was relying on Democratic support, pledged to tank other measures from coming to the floor in retribution.
The gambit almost succeeded as five House Republicans voted against bringing the socialism resolution to the floor. Given the narrow GOP majority and lawmaker absences, Johnson could not afford to lose more than two Republicans.
Also included in the package of measures to be voted on by the full House was the Northeast Lobsterman Protection Act of 2026. The bill extends the deadlines for the federal government to issue new regulations on lobster and crab fishing. Golden, who is retiring this year from a battleground House seat, is the prime Democratic co-sponsor on the bill.
THE 21 SEATS MIKE JOHNSON SAYS WILL DECIDE THE HOUSE MAJORITY
In a statement, Gluesenkamp Perez shared a story about her son having “pulled his first fish out of the Columbia River on Sunday night,” and that the “DC bubble” doesn’t get “working waterfronts require working people.”
“Nature is not a terrarium–and you don’t get effective environmentalism without the input of people who make their livelihoods and heritage on the water-whether we’re talking about lobsters or sea lions–working people need a seat at the table and electeds need to listen to them, not data from the 1990s,” Gluesenkamp Perez wrote.