Latest Coverage
See all articlesDAVID MARCUS: How Crockett's last stand in Texas could bring down Talarico
Clarence Thomas Could Be Charged With Felony Tax Fraud in Virginia on Monday
A note before we begin. Below you will find three things: an article laying out the case, a daily call to action built so your two minutes actually land, and a list of free resources from the Existentialist Republic team. Read the first, act on the second, take what is useful from the third.
Young Puppy Brought In To Be Euthanized Now Fighting for a Chance to Grow Up Thanks to Unsung Hero
PAWS New England is asking the community to rally around Denver, a young puppy fighting for life after arriving at Memphis Veterinary Specialists with a grim prognosis. The nonprofit rescue, known for taking in abandoned, neglected, and abused dogs from high-kill shelters and desperate situations, says Denver was “brought… to be euthanized with a diagnosis of parvo,” and their team is now doing everything possible to give the “little man” a chance at the future every dog deserves.
Supreme Court unanimously strikes down gun law used to prosecute Hunter Biden
The Supreme Court unanimously struck down a law banning "habitual" marijuana users from owning firearms on Thursday. The court ruled the law, which was used to prosecute Hunter Biden, was overly broad and improperly deprived individuals of their right to possess a firearm in their homes. The case involved a Texas man charged with a felony when FBI agents raiding his home found a handgun he kept for self-defense, and he also admitted to smoking marijuana every other day. In an opinion written by Justice Neil Gorsuch, the court held that the government's prosecution of Ali Hemani under a federal law prohibiting firearm possession by unlawful users of controlled substances violated the Second Amendment. Two justices, Samuel Alito and Elena Kagan, concurred only in the judgment. The federal government argued that people who regularly use illegal drugs could be disarmed based on historical laws that restricted the rights of so-called "habitual drunkards," but the court said the old laws the government relied on were too different from the modern gun restriction to justify it. "The government's analogy fails under every measure it asks us to consider," Gorsuch wrote. "The historical laws on which it relies targeted different kinds of people,