Votewiser 119th Congress News Hub

Congress Member

Rashida Tlaib

Democratic

Michigan state flag Michigan

Latest Coverage

See all articles
Image for Jocelyn Benson, John James and Rashida Tlaib agree on Con-Con
via: freep.com

Jocelyn Benson, John James and Rashida Tlaib agree on Con-Con

In November, Michigan voters will see a consequential but under-the-radar question on their midterm ballots, asking voters whether the state should hold a Constitutional Convention – widely known as a “Con-Con” – to revise Michigan’s Constitution.

The question automatically appears on Michigan ballot every 16 years, and 2026 marks the fourth time voters will be asked that question since the 1963 revision of the state constitution – the fourth in Michigan history – went into effect.

If passed, the proposal would kickstart the process of rewriting the state constitution, and that could have a significant impact on the state’s governmental and legal structure. If voters OK a Con-Con, the revised constitution would have to be approved by voters.

While past proposals ‒ in 1978, 1994 and 2010 ‒ were defeated by a clear majority, that majority shrunk slightly with every election, from a nearly 77% no vote in 1978 to 67% in 2010.

Particularly considering the current political climate, that trend poses the lingering question of whether Michiganders will decide to take the state’s constitution to the political battleground this year.

How do Michigan candidates plan to vote?

While the proposal will be in the hands of all Michigan voters, we wanted to know how candidates running in primaries for governor, U.S. Congress and state Legislature plan to vote on the Con-Con – perhaps revealing a glimpse of the current sentiment around the issue.

As part of the 2026 primary Voter Guide questionnaire, Freep Opinion asked candidates with competitive primary election races whether they'd vote to call a Con-Con.

The result? An overwhelming majority said no.

A whopping 80.4% of the 102 candidates who submitted the questionnaire said they would not vote for a Con-Con. Only 19.6% of candidates said they would, and the vast majority of are candidates running for seats in the state Legislature.

Here’s a breakdown.

Governor

Four gubernatorial candidates said they would vote against the proposal. State Senate Minority Leader Aric Nesbitt, who suspended his campaign but will still appear on the August primary ballot, was the lone yes vote. Businessman Perry Johnson did not return the questionnaire.

Yes:

Aric Nesbitt (R)

No:

Mike Cox (R)

Jocelyn Benson (D)

John James (R)

Christopher R. Swanson (D)

U.S. Senate

The two candidates running in the U.S. Senate primary said they'd vote against the proposal. Mallory McMorrow, who suspended her campaign but will still appear on the August primary ballot, also said she would also vote no.

Yes:

n/a

No:

Dr. Abdul El-Sayed (D)

Haley Maria Stevens (D)

Mallory McMorrow (D)

U.S. House

Twenty of 21 U.S. House primary candidates who responded to the questionnaire said they would vote no on the Con-Con proposal, leaving Shanelle Jackson, a Democrat challenging U.S. Rep. Rashida Tlaib in the 12th District primary, as the lone yes vote.

Yes:

Shanelle Jackson (Democrat, 12th District)

No:

Benjamin R. Ambrose (Democrat, 2nd District)

Callie Barr (Democrat, 1st District)

Kyle Blomquist (D, Democrat, 1st District)

Bridget Brink (Democrat, 7th District)

Eric Chung (Democrat, 10th District)

Aisha Farooqi (Democrat, 11th District)

Tim Greimel (Democrat, 10th District)

Diop Jermaine Harris II (Democrat, 4th District)

Christina Hines (Democrat, 10th District)

Justin Kirk (Republican, 10th District)

William Lawrence (Democrat, 7th District)

Robert Lulgjuraj (Republican, 10th District)

Sean McCann (Democrat, 4th District)

Matt Maasdam (Democrat, 7th District)

Jeremy Moss (Democrat, 11th District)

Wayne Stiles (Democrat, 1st District)

Philip Tanis (Republican, 4th District)

Rashida Tlaib (Democrat, 12th District, incumbent)

Shri Thanedar (Democrat, 13th District, incumbent)

John Paul Torres (Democrat, 11th District)

Michigan Legislature

In competitive state House and Senate primaries, 55 candidates – about 75% – said they would vote against the Con-Con proposal. Eighteen candidates said they would to call a Con-Con; 13 are Democrats and five are Republicans.

See how each candidate plans to vote in the Freep’s primary Voter Guide.

Don't see a candidate? Here's why

Our primary voter guide questionnaire includes candidates for governor and U.S. Senate, along with competitive U.S. House, Michigan House and Michigan Senate races in Wayne, Oakland and Macomb counties.

Only candidates with competitive primary elections were invited to participate in this version of the voter guide. Some candidates are running unopposed in the Aug. 4 election, and will appear in the general election voter guide ‒ we'll update this piece in the fall.

The Free Press invites all candidates in Wayne, Oakland and Macomb competitive primary races to participate in the voter guide. Free Press staff follow up to ensure each candidate received our questionnaire, but some candidates simply choose not to participate.

Sonja Krohn is an editorial assistant. Submit a letter to the editor at freep.com/letters, and we may publish it in print or online.