Sarah McBride

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free under an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives Creative Commons license as long as you follow our republishing guidelines, which require that you credit The 19th and retain our pixel. See our full guidelines for more information.

To republish, simply copy the HTML at right, which includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to The 19th. Have questions? Please email [email protected].

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

Transphobic attacks got louder, harsher and more personal. Democrats used it as an opportunity to talk about their values — and won.

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, a Republican who has passed some of the most extreme anti-LGBTQ+ laws in the country, and Democratic Rep. Sarah McBride of Delaware, the first transgender member of Congress, don’t have much in common.

But they do have a similar assessment of what drove Republicans’ historic losses in last week’s midterms.

“Anti-trans politics was a flop this election,” McBride said on a Monday press call with the Human Rights Campaign, the country’s largest LGBTQ+ advocacy group. “The American people are tired of a politics of cruelty that does nothing to lower costs or address corruption,” she said.

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

Only days before, while speaking at the Florida state Capitol, DeSantis also pinned the GOP defeat to the party’s fixation on trans people.

“I knew Republicans were in trouble when I was reading an overview about, ‘What were they running ads on?’ And they’re spending hundreds of millions of dollars across the country on transgender ads,” he said. “But that was not the issue motivating voters, and it was kind of like an attempt to just scare Republicans to vote.”

It was a remarkable analysis for a candidate who in his ultimately failed 2024 presidential campaign highlighted a video attacking President Donald Trump for his past support of LGBTQ+ people — while touting his own reputation as a governor who enacted laws that made Florida one of the most hostile places for trans people to live in the country.

Their assessments align with what political analysts on both sides and LGBTQ+ advocates have been saying since election night: Voters were simply not moved by Republicans’ singular focus on attacking trans people, even as they approved a number of ballot measures restricting trans athletes and gender-affirming care.

Republicans went all in on the messaging, pouring $400 million into anti-trans ads this election cycle, according to the Human Rights Campaign.

Contributions to Republican-aligned groups and GOP candidates by Elon Musk, the world’s richest person, totaled nearly half a billion dollars, The New York Times reported, millions of which were spent on digital and television ads hammering Democrats over their past support for trans rights. Musk’s America PAC itself churned out dozens of ads painting Democratic candidates as supporters of a “radical trans agenda” in the election’s final stretch. James Talarico, the Texas Democrat who just won his Senate seat, was a frequent target of those ads.

“That in itself is pretty telling — not that these anti-trans ads didn’t seem to work, but having all the money to spend on these anti-trans ads didn’t seem to help,” said Don Haider-Markel, a political science professor at the University of Kansas.

Republican candidates, he said, did not campaign on a clear platform or offer voters adequate solutions to their most pressing concerns. In polls released ahead of Election Day, Americans consistently ranked trans issues low on their list of priorities.

“All these efforts to paint Democrats as ‘pro-trans’ don’t seem to have had their intended effect, but it’s also an election cycle where affordability issues, the war with Iran and corruption, it turns out, were so front of mind with voters,” Haider-Markel said. “It’s not really clear to me that any other message could get through to voters other than those issues.”

Voters delivered tremendous wins for Democrats last week: Over 40 congressional districts flipped from red to blue, handing the party control of both the House and Senate for the remainder of Trump’s final term. Beyond Washington, D.C., Democrats won the majority of state governorships for the first time in more than 15 years and gained control of state legislatures in Arizona, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan, Nevada and Minnesota.

Republicans leaned heavily into anti-trans rhetoric on the campaign trail, hoping to cash in on broadening support for restrictions on trans rights while steering clear of voter frustration over the rising cost of living. In a recent 19th/YouGov poll, nearly half of adults said they were more likely to vote for a candidate who supports banning trans athletes from girls’ and women’s sports over one who does not.

But survey data also suggests that most Americans believe trans people should have equal rights, protections and general respect.

More than a third of adults in the 19th/YouGov poll said politicians shouldn’t focus on trans issues and that both Democrats and Republicans talk “too much” about trans people. In a 2024 survey by Data for Progress, a progressive think tank, more than half of voters said political campaign ads targeting trans people “have gotten mean-spirited and out of hand.”

In 2024, after Trump’s decisive victory over former Vice President Kamala Harris, some political strategists attributed the party’s success to its focus on Democrats’ support for trans rights. They frequently pointed to an ad from Trump’s reelection campaign that claimed Harris “is for they/them,” while “President Trump is for you.”

But in a September memo to GOP candidates, the conservative advocacy group American Principles Project warned that, this time around, “pressing the advantage on these issues alone, while important, may not be sufficient.”

Republicans “overlearned” the lessons from 2024, said Lanae Erickson, senior vice president at Third Way, a centrist Democratic political advocacy group. “They decided that the trans attack on its own could do all of the work that they needed to persuade cross-pressured voters, and that’s just not correct,” she said. “And Democrats figured out how to get their feet under this issue — at least some did — in a pretty productive way.”

Those candidates include Abdul El-Sayed, who won his Senate bid in Michigan after months of attack ads targeting his religion. Days before the election, he was asked on “60 Minutes” whether his Muslim faith is in tension with his liberal beliefs, including his support of what the reporter called “transgenderism.”

“I’m a constitutionalist,” El-Sayed responded. “The minute you assent to government taking anybody’s rights, whether you use them or you don’t, you are assenting to government taking everybody’s rights. And I believe in rights.”

Other Democrats took a more personal approach, like Christina Bohannan, who just won her race to represent Iowa’s 1st Congressional District. After facing attacks from her Republican opponent, Rep. Mariannette Miller-Meeks, over her past opposition to a trans sports ban, Bohannan released an ad that addressed the issue, then pivoted to the bigger picture.

“As the only one in this race who ran track in high school, it matters to me that girls’ sports are fair,” she said in the ad. “What Miller-Meeks is doing in Washington — siding with the drug companies, taking their money and sticking it to Iowans — that’s what’s really unfair.”

These responses align with what LGBTQ+ advocacy groups have spent months advising Democratic candidates to do about anti-trans campaign attacks: respond authentically, focus on key issues and don’t take the bait.

“You have to respond, but not feed into them, and then you have to move on to issues that people want to talk about,” said Ramiro Sarmiento, national press secretary of the Human Rights Campaign. “You have to stand in your val