Roger Marshall

Democratic U.S. Senate candidate Adam Hamilton outraised all his primary opponents combined in the last quarter.

Hamilton raised about $3.6 million, while incumbent Republican Sen. Roger Marshall raised about $553,000.

Despite recent fundraising, Marshall maintains a lead with $5.3 million in cash on hand compared to Hamilton's $2.6 million.

The race for Marshall's seat includes 11 Democrats, two Republicans, and one Libertarian.

Kansas Democrats have a clear frontrunner on the fundraising front in the U.S. Senate primary to challenge incumbent Republican U.S. Sen. Roger Marshall.

Adam Hamilton, a Kansas City megachurch pastor, outraised all his Democratic opponents combined in the last quarterly campaign finance report before the Aug. 4 primary election.

Hamilton also outraised — and outspent — Marshall during the last quarter, which was the quarter in which Hamilton formally launched his campaign. But Marshall still has more money in his campaign coffers than Hamilton and all the other Democrats combined.

Hamilton raised about $3.6 million in net contributions and spent about $1.1 million. Between net contributions and transfers from other authorized committees, Marshall raised about $553,000 in the past three months while spending $47,000.

Marshall had about $5.3 million cash on hand, more than double Hamilton's $2.6 million.

All of the other candidates reported fundraising figures of less than $100,000 in the last quarter, and they all had less than $100,000 cash on hand.

The Kansas Secretary of State's Office lists Marshall, the incumbent Republican, as one of 14 candidates in the 2026 elections for his seat in the U.S. Senate. There are 11 Democrats, one Libertarian and one other Republican.

The financial figures are from new campaign finance filings with the Federal Election Commission. Federal candidates and political committees that meet certain thresholds are required to disclose information about the money they raise and spend to the FEC.

The FEC's July quarterly report had a filing deadline of July 15. The reports show how much money the candidates raised and spent from April 1 through June 30 and how much cash they had on hand.

"Adam Hamilton raised more than any Kansas Senate Candidate launch in history thanks to a grassroots movement of Kansans who are sick and tired of Washington Politicians like Roger Marshall," Hamilton campaign spokesperson Tyson Brody said in a statement. "Kansans know we can do better than the Washington chaos and corruption under Roger Marshall, and that's why they're supporting Adam Hamilton."

Marshall's campaign did not issue a statement on the fundraising figures.

Marshall, of St. John, had about $5.3 million cash on hand for his campaign. That was after recording about $434,000 in net contributions and about $47,000 in net operating expenditures during the period, according to the report by Kansans for Marshall. His campaign also received about $119,000 in transfers from other authorized committees.

Hamilton, of Stilwell, had about $2.6 million cash on hand for his campaign. That was after recording about $3.6 million in net contributions and about $1.1 million in net operating expenditures during the period, according to the report by Hamilton for Kansas. His campaign also owes $50,000 in debts and obligations on a loan from himself.

Christy Davis, of Cottonwood Falls, had about $86,000 cash on hand for her campaign. That was after recording about $57,000 in net contributions and about $31,000 in net operating expenditures during the period, according to the report by Christy Davis for Kansas.

Sandy Spidel Neumann, of Mission, had about $75,000 cash on hand for her campaign. That was after recording about $22,000 in net contributions and about $86,000 in net operating expenditures during the period, according to the report by Sandy for Kansas.

Her campaign also owes $296,000 in debts and obligations. That includes $200,000 in loans from herself. Among other debts are $18,000 for fundraising consulting and $52,500 for digital fundraising.

Kevin Latz, of Mission Hills, had about $54,000 cash on hand for his campaign. That was after recording about $38,000 in net contributions and about $9,000 in net operating expenditures during the period, according to the report by LATZ4KANSAS.

Patrick Schmidt, of Topeka, had about $25,000 cash on hand for his campaign. That was after recording about $67,000 in net contributions and about $172,000 in net operating expenditures during the period, according to the report by Patrick Schmidt for Senate.

Jason Hart, of Wichita, had about $18,000 cash on hand for his campaign. That was after recording about $40,000 in net contributions and about $27,000 in net operating expenditures during the period, according to the report by Hart For Senate. His campaign owes about $4,000 in debt and obligations, with about half of that in loans from himself and the other half on an unpaid catering bill.

Noah Taylor, of Kechi, had about $11,000 cash on hand for his campaign. That was after recording about $83,000 in net contributions and about $140,000 in net operating expenditures during the period, according to the report by Noah Taylor for Kansas.

Erik Murray, of Kansas City, had about $10,000 cash on hand for his campaign. That was after recording about $30,000 in net contributions and about $66,000 in net operating expenditures during the period, according to the report by Erik Murray for Kansas.

Anne Parelkar, of Overland Park, had about $3,000 cash on hand for her campaign. That was after recording about $12,000 in net contributions and about $9,000 in net operating expenditures during the period, according to the report by Anne for Kansas. Her campaign owes $5,500 in debt and obligations on loans from herself.

Mike Soetaert, of Wellington, did not have a quarterly report on file with the FEC.

The FEC did not have filings from three other candidates: Democrat Damon Anderson, of Shawnee; Republican Pond Naramore, of Lawrence; and Libertarian David Graham, of Overland Park.